Thursday 30 May 2013

Realities-Within-Realities: V/H/S (2012)

From https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-PRwve0p-aBmESe_NcT6dwdAgTG-AifSjRP8av8VK_OTk69zGNGWSFnnN0wJmG1-y2FS77ANlixLoPnAOdTCit6CG3y_q83o5vUfthhiIpXw0jCBGi5llU1yKm9kR5iQR04wQ75bL_Xa0/s1600/vhsmovie.jpg

Dirs. Various [Each One Stated For Each Segment of Film]
USA

Tape 56 (Dir. Adam Wingard) [Beginning Act]
V/H/S offers a fascinating concept with its synopsis. The found footage sub-genre inherently plays with subjective reality, so splicing it with the anthology sub-genre, found material intercut into a piece of found material bookending it all, creates reality bubbles that maybe even the producers of the film didn’t realise would be caused. A group of young men break into an old man’s house to steal a videotape worth a lot of money to the person who’s sent them there, only to find a dead body slumped in an armchair and numerous tapes that they start sorting through. On each tape is a story of folly and the worst that could happen while everything is not what it seems in the house they’ve broken into more than it was already. In the first scene, these characters are vile, obnoxious examples of corrupted masculinity taken to a further level by the opening scene, but films allow us to be placed into the world of people who are appalling and force us to follow them. A found footage film allows this to happen more easily. Once in the house, one of them sits down and puts a tape in while everyone else, split into groups followed by two cameras, investigate for the tape, leading us to the segments one at a time with the activity in the house intercutting it.

There was hesitance going into V/H/S after a few opinions I had heard, but I was optimistic. I have to put a SPOILER warning here for the rest of the review, but for each segment it will vary so please read the tag before each part. It’s a messy procedure, but it’s fitting for the anthology film at hand and hopefully you will get some of the review left to read even if you haven’t seen V/H/S.

Amateur Night (Dir. David Brucker) [Slight Spoiler]
Regardless of any other thoughts, I will be grateful for this segment as there is a lot to defend in it against the others. It falls into the same area of many of the others of men crossing with women of a dubious nature, an issue which some have had with V/H/S, but here the story complicates it in an interesting way I hoped continued in the other segments. The men are also obnoxious jocks, another reoccurring aspect in these segments, but there is nothing wrong with either one or two of the pieces following these types of characters, especially when they are fleshed out in such an short length of time. They are hateable people, planning to secretly film a porno and cruising for women, but not only should the viewer be forced to ask whether they are just as bad as them mentally by following through their leering eyes, but what happens to them (violently) makes you realise they are human beings regardless. And the dangerous woman is as complex as well and sympathetic even after what happens. It is all because of the actress Hannah Fierman, whose performance is the one in V/H/S that is legitimately good and whose physical appearance, having the biggest eyes I have ever seen for an actor or actress onscreen, instantly captivated me to her, especially when the twist is followed by an unexpected emotional note after the brutality that takes place. I really, really hope someone has the right idea and casts her in more films.

Amateur Night also snuffs out one of the biggest leaps of logic that this sub-genre has to deal with – “Why would you keep filming?!” – by having the story viewed through camera glasses. Ludicrous yes, but as leaps of logic go I could work with it, especially as the effect adds an exceptional level of tension and panic when the worst takes place. The segment promised so much for the whole of V/H/S.

Second Honeymoon (Dir. Ti West) [Slight Spoiler]
Unfortunately with Ti West’s segment the rest of V/H/S starts to slowly die onscreen. Beyond its premise it was supposed to show the best of American filmmaking in genre cinema, but barring David Bruckner with Amateur Night, only a few bright spots are provided by the others. Second Honeymoon could have worked, a male and female couple taking a vacation in Americana only to get the attention of a mysterious woman, but it quickly falls into tedious drama scripting. Its horror story is uninteresting – avoiding the jock characters for a male and female character of some sympathy, but with another ominous female outsider – and has a really dumb twist even if clues are laid down beforehand. The jury in my head is out on Ti West. Cabin Fever 2: Spring Fever (2009) is average, and he botched the perfect first three quarters of The House of the Devil (2009) with an abruptness that can justifiable compared to premature ejaculation despite how tasteless that metaphor is. For a great new horror director, he has not presented something that is standout. Far from dismissing the anthology completely from this point on, Second Honeymoon should have been the one misfire before the others brought the film back up in quality.

Tuesday The 17th (Dir. Glenn McQuaid) [Spoiler]
In this segment’s sole defence, the idea of what its evil force appears to be is ingenious. Using the found footage medium to its advantage, the tropes it is playing with, just by guessing what the title is a reference to, are pushed to where even the recorded reality is easy to manipulate and distort by a prescience more powerful that even the outside force that records the events that befall a group of young adults who go to the woodlands to smoke pot and fornicate. It becomes clear however, again with this segment, that most of the directors are not pushing themselves to a high level of quality. It follows the stereotypical college student group you find in slasher films, from the same mould as the jocks of three of the other segments even if they are unisex, whose dialogue as with most of the vignettes consist of saying “fuck” in surprise at what is happening to them and their desire to drink and have sex as if there is nothing else in their existence. V/H/S could have been a message of the folly of this attitude to life, especially with the segments about all male groups, but it fails here as in most of them because none of the characters are interesting. They’re generic and it’s another dangerous woman character that appears in this segment even if the actual evil is something much more unhuman. Like most cinema, it commits the sin of wasting such potentially good ideas with a bad script around them.

The Sick Thing That Happened To Emily When She Was Younger (Dir. Joe Swanberg) [No Spoiler]
The issue of a Skype conversation recorded on VHS tape is pointless to worry about as the idea, like many others in the anthology, had potential. Complicated by the two people being far away physically yet able to see each other, the dangers that threaten one and the helplessness of the other would create a frightening proposition. A young woman named Emily is troubled by both a strange pain in her arm and the possibility that her rented apartment is haunted, a series of Skype calls between her and her boyfriend unfolding as she becomes more isolated. Unlike the other segments except Amateur Night, even if it continues the nudity of the others, it has a female character who is sympathetic inherently and has a heartbreaking (and stomach churning) resolution behind it all. It also has the other memorable aspect of the anthology outside of Amateur Night with a jump scare involving a door that is surprising in how calm and matter-of-fact it is depicted, as if it’s accidentally crossing a whimsical moment with the utterly freakish. Sadly the writing is completely undercooked and with its twist ending has garbled plotting. This is surprising since the director of this is Joe Swanberg, who, having not seen any of his other work, is supposed to one of the best hidden secrets of current American cinema with his contributions to indie and mumblecore cinema. I hope that this is just a blip before I get to films like Hannah Takes The Stairs (2007), as this is not good enough to justify being more than average or poor.

Tape 56 [Resolution] (Dir. Adam Wingard) [No Spoiler]
The entirety of V/H/S as a project is botched by its end because of the fact mentioned that little of it is good enough in terms of writing or appearance for a group of directors said to be the new Kings of Western horror cinema. The bookmarking film Tape 56 leads to nothing, a scare ending that is completely pointless. It doesn’t weave together the potency of the vast collection of taped recordings of horrors in a way that reminds one of an atrocity exhibition for voyeurs and retro geeks, neither making videotape scary again long after the original Ringu (1998) did so or given you a well set-up punch line. In fact, this is not even the end of the anthology...

10/31/98 (Dirs. Radio Silence) [Massive Spoiler]
Again another good premise like the others – on Halloween you would probably view a supernatural occurrence as smoke machines and wires – but it doesn’t succeed. It even tries to make its own group of rowdy men vaguely likable, and finds a way of dealing with the logic with the camera by having it part of a character’s bear suit, Nicolas Cage crossed with Andrea Scarface from Pedro Almodomar’s Kika (1993), but it shows again the ultimate failure of V/H/S, like a lot of current genre cinema, of offering the incredibly redundant from good ideas as if they are works of genius. Radio Silence’s entry becomes as average haunted house film with obvious CGI heavy effects and another ending where it’s a woman you should run the opposite way from if you’re male. This reoccurring trend in the segments, aside from Amateur Night where it’s played with thoughtfully, is not inherently misogynistic but something more sadder; a dwindled pool of ideas shared by the creators that unfortunately leads to most of them going with a twist about women backstabbing the male characters in the back by complete accident.  With a flat anticlimax to the whole film, it leaves on a terrible note.

Conclusion [No Spoiler]

Said film is a completely failed project for consistency and as a single entity. The white elephant that makes V/H/S even more pointless, that Harmony Korine’s Trash Humpers (2009) exists at all, does not help things either for a film named after the home format and all the elicit fears and enticements a medium like it, despite being a pain in the arse to rewind and liable to be destroyed by magnets, could generate. It should evoke an unmarked tape found hidden somewhere secret that could show you some truly horrifying and liable to change reality itself. V/H/S’s greatest failure is that it never evokes this sense of dread of a scratchy recorded home movie and how even the tracking failing, that one of the shorts does try to use for tension building admittedly, could bring the hairs up on your neck. 

From http://anythinghorror.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/vhs-2.jpg

Wednesday 22 May 2013

Cinema of the Abstract: Inferno (1980)

From http://wrongsideoftheart.com/wp-content/gallery/posters-i/inferno_poster_02.jpg


Dir. Dario Argento
Italy

From https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhlWWbySTR_tFHBkKW0u8oAY4wvJUrpt8fKZOEJ3Xl6ku6w5D8JZb7rbQklosSFwd4juiVZrPmSoMAiOPgfUGq1rSgKlzlYTNzvpTZOtJUc39NzUPIzFU1jtxU3wFA4fBXBCvP7CLn1_mI/s1600/avchd-inferno.1980.720p.mkv_snapshot_00.05.13_%255B2011.03.15_21.42.36%255D.jpg

[It’s been a while since this has been added to a “Cinema of the Abstract” review, but for anyone reading this blog for the first time, this is part of a collection of reviews of unconventional and experimental films that I have been housing on my MUBI profile and will continue to expand. The link to it is here.]

From http://brandonfilm.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/inferno-bluecorridor.png

If there was ever a film obsesses with the shape and enclosure of corridors, secret passages hidden in buildings that leads to dark machinations, it is Dario Argento’s follow-up to his legendary film Suspiria (1977). The characters can only follow along in this film’s locations, a hotel with numerous connecting pipes and air pockets that allow voices to be heard in varying rooms, libraries with rooms full of bubbling pots of viscous liquid, places which show more and more but shrink the presence of the individual within them against everything they encounter. With this film, Argento himself expanded the tone and content of Suspiria by expanding the mythology. With Inferno you have the Three Mothers introduced, three witches of immense evil. The Mother of Sighs, depicted in Suspiria, the Mother of Tears, who is in this film but is devoted to completely in the 2007 film that turned this series of films into a trilogy, and the Mother of Darkness, who is centre to Inferno. Inferno is a mood piece, which caught me off guard on the first viewing even though I had come to expect this sort of tone with Suspiria. It does have a simple story that the film leaps from into this. The information of the Three Mothers’ existence, in old published editions of a diary of the architect who created their homes, is starting to be violently suppressed by the influence of the remaining Mothers, pulling in the brother of a girl who, living in New York, the home of the Mother of Darkness, starts this series of deaths by acquiring a copy of the book.

From http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film3/blu-ray_reviews53/inferno_blu-ray_/large/large_inferno_blu-ray_6x.jpg

Everything that made Suspiria what it was – the atmosphere, the bright coloured lighting, the methodical pace intercut with brutal deaths – is continued in Inferno but it proved to be a lesser known, even divisive, continuation, probably because it strips the plotting down to its minimum on purpose, and more significantly splits up the film into segments following different characters. On a first viewing, you will not know what to expect with Inferno, especially when individual unexpectedly die. In Suspiria there was a clear protagonist, but here it is the expansion of the mythology which is central to the film and how it is violently discovered is the driving force for everything around it. On this viewing, this presentation was perfect, Dario Argento playing with the tropes of this area of gothic horror while letting himself have the most bravado moments in his filmography in terms of content. Everything is to a high standard – the camera movements he used, the colour lighting and set design, Keith Emerson’s score – and presents numerous moments that are instantly memorable. It’s hard to top this film’s most well known scene that is the first set piece, of a room underwater presented to the screen in a way that is strangely calming before the punch line to it takes place, but the film’s supernatural atmosphere increases as it goes along and the film’s various strands are cut to down to the final reveal of who the Mother of Darkness truly is. A lot of what is Argento’s virtue, which I criminally ignored, is how much his excess style is a stronger foundation for his filmmaking to rest upon than one takes for granted. His seventies and eighties output in hindsight is deliberately unconventional, and a lot better written than people have presumed it to be if it is viewed as a jumping off point for his to craft images from. He is very much a director who explains everything through images unless it’s a giallo mystery story or a key plot point he couldn’t have shown through said images. He uses a simple premise or idea, and expands it through the images and music. The final film onscreen is an intense, haunting romp through this area of cinema.

From https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIx-xYiK6j56iZRL0-_h8uAhDYGb7paMRmXf1Gbmscr-e1fl5QhjEfvbZPOwrrcwl4KEuUm2BYOl925ye8S1KoJDicONJNlHPL98TQjKQFBH5liu4K9EaCYyZYgKWo9H_76V8-IzbzPiyD/s1600/Inferno+(22).jpg

These thoughts apply to all of the films of his I’ve rewatched this year as well, finally *getting* the virtues of his work at their fullest. There’s not more I can actually say than to request all of you reading this review to watch Inferno. If you’re cold on it and haven’t watched it in a while, try rewatching it again with these words in mind.

From http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film3/blu-ray_reviews52/inferno_blu-ray_argento_/large/large_inferno_blu-ray_8x.jpg

Saturday 11 May 2013

Re-Review (Just To Confuse People): Pistol Opera (2001)

From https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh8iR3t0YRwXw7NvoIGkFOy594WRkkFl1GSmD0cLo3_CBs39hmN-kh4n5LXaak95RAJVxE0YY9d_hjwczVf5IrImdSvLj7KI7yDcuQGx2YhIC2Z-9tH4-BSCfBAc9Jyf4HDPsS5nqXywZc/s1600/pistolopera.jpg


Dir. Seijun Suzuki
Japan

From http://file.satyricon.ni-moe.com/Pistol-Opera1.jpg

This will not be a large review. A lot of what I said last time still connects to my thoughts on this film. It’s the context which has changed. I suspected that I would have a drastic change of mind on Pistol Opera when I got around to a second viewing, and that was thankfully the case. The narrative of Pistol Opera is a lot clearer on this viewing and one anyone can latch upon in its simplicity. Clearly set in the same world of Suzuki’s Branded To Kill (1967) and its Guild of assassins, ranked and able to be climbed into higher positions through killing off the people above you, it follows rank #3 Stray Cat, a woman whose fixation with guns goes into a sexual fetish, getting back into the work. She is assigned to eliminate rank #1 Hundred Eyes, a mysterious assassin who is completely unknown and has intentions to eliminate every assassin below them and the entire Guild itself. With only a young girl Sayoko, enamoured with her, who is really trustable, Stray Cat has to protect herself from Hundred Eyes, other assassins and the comical figure of Rank #0 The Champ, the protagonist of Branded To Kill, who is just as obsessed with his glorious (but exceptionally brief) moment at rank #1 as much as giving Stray Cat advice. It’s a clear narrative, but as mentioned in the first review, it’s the presentation that has to be adjusted to.

From http://dark-victory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/pistolopera34a.jpg

From the director who became so bored making b-movie crime films for Nikkatsu Company that he pushed his luck making films like Branded To Kill, the tone of Pistol Opera was what I had to readjust myself to. It is very slow paced, methodical and contemplative in tone, the stereotype of a film of a much older director later in their career, but its subject matter goes against this and is furthered by Suzuki’s clear disregard for narrative. The narrative is actually very clear, but the presentation of dialogue, plot points and sequences is purposely abstracted. The few battles between assassins become performance art and the reality is continually pierced by non-diagetic tangents in the film’s world, even with a moment characters barrage each other with countless insults presented by close ups of their heads, against purple, and the mixing of Japanese and English. Its absurdist and very theatrical, his concentration on look, colour and presentation as important, if more so, than the plot point at that point he started with. The result is imaginative, a veteran with the dexterity of a young man in showing what is onscreen.

From http://www.jonathanrosenbaum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/po-dangling-body.png

The film becomes much more abstract in its final act, Suzuki adding unexpected philosophical and political monologues and metaphors which may seem incongruous. I’ve not quite understood them all, but I’ve really became enamoured by them as this unexpected seriousness is one of the many swerves that Suzuki has been doing throughout the first three-quarters. It also leads to a final gun battle that I’ve described before as the hell sequence of Jigoku (1960) recreated through theatre, fun fair iconography and a playground. Also add to this illustration, pop art iconography, Peter Greenaway films and a set designed by manga artists, a kabuki theatre and Derek Jarman. The result are tremendous and is the centre piece that made me unable to completely dismiss Pistol Opera on the first viewing, and proves how good the whole film is. It was good that I did this review so I did not leave Pistol Opera with a divisive review only, but it also was good because the two reviews together also proves that a second viewing can have such a drastic effect on one’s thought on such a film. And what an appropriate film like Pistol Opera, about breaking expectations, to have this doubling effect of opinion that shifts?

From http://www.artofeurope.com/suzuki/pistol.jpg

Friday 10 May 2013

Videotape Swapshop Reviews: The Wicker Man (1973)

From http://voiceofcinema.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/wicker_man_poster_01.jpg


Dir. Robin Hardy
UK

This will be the last of the Videotape Swapshop review links in a while until next month. By then the three months of summer will include links to numerous reviews I am doing for that site. The film here today, back to now, is the original version and one of the best British films ever made. The Nicolas Cage version requires an entirely different set of criteria to write about it, so I will stay with this one at this time.


From http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0s46vvN1q1qaun7do1_1280.jpg

Monday 6 May 2013

April 2013 in Film

From http://www.cinelogue.com/images/992.jpg


A hectic few months or so ahead means that the content on this website will not be appearing as rapidly as it has been. Hopefully one post or so will still be posted on the site a week while I concentrate on a series of projects for Videotape Swapshop. I've also modified the awards for this week, significantly deciding that I could no longer use Steven Seagal's name for an award because of the copy write expiring within the month of April. Hopefully this less detailed list will live up to the ones of before when Seagal was still named over one of the most significant awards.

Best Film of the Month
1. Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors (Sergei Parajanov, 1964/Soviet Union) – 10/10 [Rewatch]
2. The Wicker Man (Robin Hardy, 1973/UK) – 10/10 [Rewatch]
3. Gozu (Takashi Miike, 2003/Japan) – 10/10 [Rewatch]
4. Pitfall (Hiroshi Teshigahara, 1962/Japan) – 10/10 [Rewatch]
5. Yoshiwara: The Pleasure Quarter aka. Hero of the Red Light District (Tomu Uchida, 1960/Japan) – 10/10
6. Pigsty aka. Porcile (Pier Paolo Pasolini, 1969/France-Italy) – 10/10 [Rewatch]
7. Dead Man (Jim Jarmusch, 1995/Germany-Japan-USA) – 10/10 [Rewatch]
8. Holy Motors (Leos Carax, 2012/France-Germany) – 10/10 [Rewatch]
9. The Witch Who Came from the Sea (Matt Cimber, 1976/USA) – 10/10 [Rewatch]
10. A Man Vanishes (Shohei Imamura, 1967/Japan) – 9/10

Honourable Mentions
This Transient Life aka. Mujo (Akio Jissoji, 1970/Japan) – 9/10
Sunset Blvd. (Billy Wilder, 1950/USA) – 10/10
Deep Red (Dario Argento, 1975/Italy) – 9/10 [Rewatch]
Que la bête meure / Juste Avant La Nuit aka. Just Before Nightfall (Claude Chabrol, 1969 & 1971/France-Italy) – 9/10 [Score for both]

Biggest Surprise of the Month 
1. Yoshiwara: The Pleasure Quarter aka. Hero of the Red Light District (Tomu Uchida, 1960/Japan) – 10/10
2. This Transient Life aka. Mujo (Akio Jissoji, 1970/Japan) – 9/10
3. Que la bête meure / Juste Avant La Nuit aka. Just Before Nightfall (Claude Chabrol, 1969 & 1971/France-Italy) – 9/10 [Score for both]
4. Dead Man (Jim Jarmusch, 1995/Germany-Japan-USA) – 10/10 [Rewatch]
5. Body Double (Brian De Palma, 1984/USA) – 8/10 [Rewatch]
6. Sakura Wars (Takaaki Ishiyama 1997/Japan) – 8/10
7. Park Row (Samuel Fuller, 1952/USA) – 8/10
8. The Crime of Monsieur Lange (Jean Renoir, 1936/France) – 8/10

Discovery of the Month
1. Yoshiwara: The Pleasure Quarter aka. Hero of the Red Light District (Tomu Uchida, 1960/Japan) – 10/10
2. This Transient Life aka. Mujo (Akio Jissoji, 1970/Japan) – 9/10
3. A Man Vanishes (Shohei Imamura, 1967/Japan) – 9/10
4. Sakura Wars (Takaaki Ishiyama 1997/Japan) – 8/10
5. The Crime of Monsieur Lange (Jean Renoir, 1936/France) – 8/10
6. Walker (Ming-liang Tsai, 2012/Hong Kong) – 8/10
7. Nazarene Cruz and The Wolf aka. Nazareno Cruz y el lobo (Leonardo Favio, 1975/Argentina) – 7/10
8. Naukri (Bimal Roy, 1954/India) – 7/10

Biggest Change of Opinion
1. Dead Man (Jim Jarmusch, 1995/Germany-Japan-USA) – 10/10 [Rewatch]
2. Deep Red (Dario Argento, 1975/Italy) – 9/10 [Rewatch]
3. Snake Eyes (Brian De Palma, 1998/Canada-USA) – 8/10 [Rewatch]
4. Tenebrae (Dario Argento, 1982/Italy) – 8/10 [Rewatch]
5. Pitfall (Hiroshi Teshigahara, 1962/Japan) – 10/10 [Rewatch]
6. Body Double (Brian De Palma, 1984/USA) – 8/10 [Rewatch]
7. The Beyond (Lucio Fulci, 1981/Italy) – 8/10 [Rewatch]
8. Ninja Scroll (Yoshiaki Kawajiri, 1993/Japan) – 8/10 [Rewatch]
9. Z (Costa-Gavras, 1969/Algeria-France) – 8/10 [Rewatch]

Honourable Mentions
Holy Motors (Leos Carax, 2012/France-Germany) – 10/10 [Rewatch]
Gozu (Takashi Miike, 2003/Japan) – 10/10 [Rewatch]

Most Divisive Film of the Month
1. Duelle (une quarantaine) aka. Twilight (A Quarantine) (Jacques Rivette, 1976/France) – 6/10
2. Smokin’ Aces (Joe Carnahan, 2007/France-UK-USA) – 7/10 [Rewatch]
3. Bloody Parrot (Shan Hua, 1981/Hong Kong) – 6/10
4. Eden of the East Movie I: The King of Eden (Kenji Kamiyama, 2009/Japan) – 6/10

The Most Underrated Film
1. Bram Stoker’s Dracula (Francis Ford Coppola, 1992/USA) – 8/10
2. Snake Eyes (Brian De Palma, 1998/Canada-USA) – 8/10 [Rewatch]
3. Body Double (Brian De Palma, 1984/USA) – 8/10 [Rewatch]
4. Smokin’ Aces (Joe Carnahan, 2007/France-UK-USA) – 7/10 [Rewatch]
5. They Eat Scum (Nick Zedd, 1979/USA) – 7/10
6. Venus in Furs (Jesus Franco, 1969/Italy-UK-West Germany) – 8/10
7. Hudson Hawk (Michael Lehmann, 1991/USA) – 7/10 [Rewatch]
8. Contamination (Luigi Cozzi, 1980/Italy-West Germany) – 8/10

The Most Overrated Film
1. Do The Right Thing (Spike Lee, 1989/USA) – 7/10 [Rewatch]
2. Bloody Parrot (Shan Hua, 1981/Hong Kong) – 6/10
3. Highlander (Russell Mulcahy, 1986/UK) – 5/10 [Rewatch]

Biggest Disappointment of the Month
1. The King of The Kickboxers (Lucas Lowe, 1990/Hong Kong-USA) – 4/10
2. Waxwork (Anthony Hickox, 1988/UK-USA-West Germany) – 4/10
3. The Bloody Judge (Jesus Franco, 1970/Italy-Liechtenstein-Spain-West Germany) – 4/10
4. The Edukators (Hans Weingartner, 2004/Austria-Germany) – 5/10

The Long Awaited (Re)Viewing That Lived Up To Expectations
1. Death Laid an Egg (Giulio Questi, 1968/France-Italy) – 8/10
2. Zu: Warriors of the Magic Mountain (Tsui Hawk, 1983/Hong Kong) – 8/10
3. A Man Vanishes (Shohei Imamura, 1967/Japan) – 9/10
4. Body Double (Brian De Palma, 1984/USA) – 8/10 [Rewatch]
5. Eden of the East Movie 2: Paradise Lost (Kenji Kamiyama, 2010/Japan) – 8/10
6. Venus in Furs (Jesus Franco, 1969/Italy-UK-West Germany) – 8/10
7. Park Row (Samuel Fuller, 1952/USA) – 8/10

The Pleasure of the Month I'll [Sadly] Have To Defend
1. Contamination (Luigi Cozzi, 1980/Italy-West Germany) – 8/10
2. Don’t Go Near the Park (Lawrence D. Foldes, 1981/USA) – 6/10
3. Hudson Hawk (Michael Lehmann, 1991/USA) – 7/10 [Rewatch]

The Abstract Film of the Month
1. Gozu (Takashi Miike, 2003/Japan) – 10/10 [Rewatch]
2. Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors (Sergei Parajanov, 1964/Soviet Union) – 10/10 [Rewatch]
3. Pigsty aka. Porcile (Pier Paolo Pasolini, 1969/France-Italy) – 10/10 [Rewatch]
4. Pitfall (Hiroshi Teshigahara, 1962/Japan) – 10/10 [Rewatch]
5. Death Laid an Egg (Giulio Questi, 1968/France-Italy) – 8/10
6. A Man Vanishes (Shohei Imamura, 1967/Japan) – 9/10
7. This Transient Life aka. Mujo (Akio Jissoji, 1970/Japan) – 9/10
8. Holy Motors (Leos Carax, 2012/France-Germany) – 10/10 [Rewatch]
9. Zu: Warriors of the Magic Mountain (Tsui Hawk, 1983/Hong Kong) – 8/10
10. Berberian Sound Studio (Peter Strickland, 2012/UK) – 8/10

Honourable Mentions
They Eat Scum (Nick Zedd, 1979/USA) – 7/10
The Beyond (Lucio Fulci, 1981/Italy) – 8/10 [Rewatch]
Duelle (une quarantaine) aka. Twilight (A Quarantine) (Jacques Rivette, 1976/France) – 6/10
Bram Stoker’s Dracula (Francis Ford Coppola, 1992/USA) – 8/10
Venus in Furs (Jesus Franco, 1969/Italy-UK-West Germany) – 8/10
Sunset Blvd. (Billy Wilder, 1950/USA) – 10/10
Don’t Go Near the Park (Lawrence D. Foldes, 1981/USA) – 6/10
A Scanner Darkly (Richard Linklater, 2006/USA) – 8/10 [Rewatch]
The Work of Michel Gondry
Bloody Parrot (Shan Hua, 1981/Hong Kong) – 6/10

Worst Film of the Month
Chillerama (Adam Rifkin, Tim Sullivan, Adam Green and Joe Lynch, 2011/USA) – 2/10

The Non Sequiter of the Month Award
Don’t Go Near the Park (Lawrence D. Foldes, 1981/USA) – 6/10

The Person(s) of The Month
The Participants of the MUBI Directors Cup 2013

Dishonorable Person (Or Concept) of the Month
Adam Rifkin, Tim Sullivan, Adam Green and Joe Lynch for Chillerama (2011)


89 Works Watched In March
47 Rewatched Works
42 New Works Seen


From http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lgt2esDMln1qchzcgo1_500.png

Saturday 4 May 2013

Videotape Swapshop Review: Gozu (2003)

From http://homepage.ntlworld.com/iain.ireland1/Gozu.jpg


Dir. Takashi Miike
Japan

After the disappointment of Family (2001) I can finally link to a review of mine of a great Miike film that shows him at his best, the sort that horrifies yet is brilliantly hilarious and is intelligent. I.e. a Takashi Miike film through and through.



From http://www.videotapeswapshop.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/gozu6.jpg

Friday 3 May 2013

Mini-Review: The King of the Kickboxers (1990)

From http://images.moviepostershop.com/king-of-the-kickboxers-movie-poster-1990-1020204106.jpg


Dir. Lucas Lowe
Hong Kong-USA

Ten years before, just after he has won the kick boxing championship in Thailand, the older brother of Jake Donahue (Loren Avedon) is killed by the uber-tough and vicious Khan (Billy Blanks, possibly influencing a couple of Street Fighter II characters just through his hair and fashion sense). Jake becomes a cop who plays on the edge, breaking protocols, who goes back to Thailand after Khan when he discovers his involvement in a series of martial art snuff films. In terms of look and ideas, The King of the Kickboxers does at least have something to bring to the table. A gruesome (and ridiculous) premise, some saltier and eyebrow raising dialogue, and an early nineties aesthetic of bright, primary colours and really dated fashion. The Street Fighter comparison is not that far off, and the final climatic battle in a bamboo cage of death is an admirable attempt at an interesting “boss battle”.

Unfortunately it’s a pretty bland early nineties martial film outside of this. Including a large segment of the hero training with comedic humour and a stereotypical blonde love interest, it never really tries anything interesting or peculiar. For a Hong Kong co-production, it also feels far too much like the (usually) blander Western counterparts. Godfrey Ho’s Undefeatable (1993) shows how these early nineties, American style martial art films can be memorable, and that film has solid martial arts fighting. The participants in The King of the Kickboxers, particularly Blanks and Avedon, are good fighters, but the fight style is limited and undermined by how the scenes, like many Western combat films, break fight sequences into pieces with the editing and camera shots. Ong-bak (2003) this is not despite the kickboxing and Thai setting. Also, blameable on the script, Jake is a completely unlikable arsehole, the snark for a hero like this pushed too far and making him an irritating individual, undermining the engagement with the protagonist absolutely needed in films like this no matter how ridiculous they are. The King of the Kickboxers is pretty forgettable.

From http://www.cityonfire.com/wp-content/uploads/2002/02/KingoftheKickboxers-KeithCooke_LorenAvedon_8bb989b4f05a522d92502e9304708243.jpg

Videotape Swapshop Review: Hausu aka. House (1977)

From http://positivelybleak.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Hausu-796343.jpg


Dir. Nobuhiko Ôbayashi
Japan

New to the Swapshop site, a review of the recent darling of cult cinema. Is it really one of the strangest films ever made though, or just a very good one?


From http://www.videotapeswapshop.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/house-1.jpg