From http://stagevu.com/img/thumbnail/owexfdyavficbig.jpg |
Dir. Jean-Luc Godard
France-Italy
From http://adamcr007.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/alphaville-1965-12-g.jpg |
Jean-Luc Godard was once the most overrated director for me. Unlike
the drastic change of mind, for the positive, I had for the films of Luis Buñuel, which has effectively
changed my viewpoints of cinema completely in the last year or so, the change
of mind for Godard has been slow and
gradual while still as important. Even when I hated Godard for the most part, I still watched as many films as I could
of his as a completists and a fan of cinema trying to figure out his acclaim was
to cinema viewers, going as far as viewing Week
End (1967), a film I despised once, six times even if the first four
viewings were painful. As I saw the virtues in his work, I realised, with my
growing maturity, how complex, brilliantly made and legitimately intelligent
his work was. I even prefer his post-Week
End work which has been dismissed as pretentious but is that of a veteran at
the top of his craft, even when making a minute long short which has the
soundtrack from a tennis match spliced into it. Amongst all the Godard films and shorts I still need to
see, countless in number, I need to rewatch many films that I had dismissed
before, especially the pre-Week End
works that made his name.
Using the pre-existing character Lenny
Caution (Eddie Constantine), Alphaville is a science fiction film in
which Caution, posing as a reporter, enter the titular city to bring back a
professor to the Lands Without, only to see that the city is run by Alpha 60, a
sentient computer who has removed “illogical” behaviour, human emotions such as
love, sadness and joy, from the populous under the belief of the greater good. Upfront,
Alphaville is drastically different
from conventional sci-fi dystopia films with similar premises made now, even to
later Godard films with precise,
directorial styles to them. Alphaville
was partly improvised and even the parts that may have been carefully planned
out feel the same way to, low budget and stark in tone even with a rich plot to
it, drastically pushing itself away from what would be expected from it. Using Paris
itself at the time as the setting for the dystopia, most of the film’s science
fiction is unshown ideas, background details and comments that have to be
imagined in the viewer’s head. The gritty, darkly lit locations works
effectively for the premise, but the concepts must be added to the film by
imagination; terms like “The Lands
Without”, cities like “Tokyorama”
or “Cinerama museums” must be
conjured up by the viewer rather than presented to you already visually. Then there
is the core idea of how Alpha 60’s logic destroys the humanity in people,
presented through Anna Karina as
Natacha von Braun, beautiful but a cold vessel from a metropolis where crying
is punishable by death and where the question “Why?” is replaced with “because”.
Caution becomes enamoured by her and does what he can to break down the behaviour
she has been givem. Very much a genre film rather than Godard’s more essay-like works, it expresses its story background
and ideas through the mood of a noir film with a trench coat wearing hero, a
femme fatale and questions left unknown.
It does show though, quite early
on in his career, where Godard would
go, not alien from the old master who made Film
socialisme (2010) decades later with manipulation of words, visuals and
sound throughout it. Sadly the version I viewed of Alphaville did not subtitle a part of it that I would have
immensely taken a lot from – a series of diagrams that manipulate images and
words that Alpha 60 monologues over in his omnipresent, deep, electronically
aided voice – but the breaking down of standard conventions of narrative and
structure Godard is famous for is
here and allows him, like in his other work, to place idea after idea within
pockets and gaps within the main film. Alphaville
works as a sci-fi story immensely, but cannot be viewed in terms of a
conventional film, missing the point to how it alters its narrative trappings
subtly and abstractly. What could be viewed as logic or plot gaps, like for me
in the first viewing of this film years ago, turn out to be gaps Godard put in there on purpose so the
viewer would start thinking about how and why they watch the film. Of course, Godard is clearly passionate for the
pulpy storytelling and the aesthetics of “coolness”, Constantine’s grizzled looks sitting well in a world of blackened
streets, guns and smoking, but what prevents it from being a dated European
arthouse film from the Sixties is that Godard
takes advantage of the dormant science fiction writer inside him to his
advantage in probing views of humanity and what society means. Logic by itself
creates a dictatorship where art is lost, perceived to be for the better by
higher-ups, and language is watered down as words are banned from the
dictionary. Even the cinema, in a brief anecdote, Godard’s obsession, becomes a place where illogical people are put
into and killed on mass through electric shocks. The film is a melding of real
ideas of politics, pulp storytelling, grim social commentary and science
fiction as a vessel for “what-if” scenarios. By its end, Alphaville emphasises how this tangential mass of pieces in his
work, once a great flaw for me, is in fact his greatest virtue as a director.
From http://files.myopera.com/RoughneckCowboy/blog/vlcsnap-141451.png |
No comments:
Post a Comment