Showing posts with label Genre: Splatstick. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Genre: Splatstick. Show all posts

Tuesday, 22 October 2013

Represent New Zealand: Braindead (1992)

From http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lis2bj7oI61qfen0ho1_500.jpg

Dir. Peter Jackson

The tone of the film is perfectly set up before the film actually starts. There's an image of the New Zealand flag. An image of a young Queen Elizabeth II on a horse in regal clothes. It suits the ridiculous tone of the film and explains so much about why Braindead became as it is. It's not just because it's still one of the goriest films ever made and so over-the-top in its content. It's because it still does this while being so jovial. So quaint. British idiosyncrasies twisted around and rebuilt through a new viewpoint of a former British colony. That throughout it, for all the bizarre dismemberment, it feels so middle class in tone, which makes it funnier. Set in fifties New Zealand, Lionel (Timothy Balme) is a likable young man who has the potential for eternal happiness when the young Spanish woman who works at the nearby grocer's, Paquita (Diana Peñalver), takes immense interest in him romantically and pulls him out of his shell, the predictions of her grandmother through tarot cards about literal eternal happiness making her adamant about sparking the relationship. Unfortunately Lionel's sole surviving relative in his close family, his mother (Elizabeth Moody), is domineering and controlling of him, wishing him to be there for her beck and call, and certainly she's not happy when his attention is directed to Paquita. This situation is made worse when Mum is accidentally bitten by the newest exhibit at the zoo, the horrifying (but, brilliantly, stop motion) Sumatran rat-monkey. Shown in the pre-credits to be acquired by the zoo through gruesome cost, the rat-monkey's bite causes a victim to decay will still alive, die and become a member of the living dead with the ability to survive even being hacked to pieces. The zombification of Mum forces Lionel to become a social outcast, breaking Paquita's heart in the process and pushing her away, as he is stuck with his sleazy uncle (Ian Watkin) swooping it to try and acquire all the wealth his late sister had, and a basement of ever increasing numbers of zombies. As zombie cinema has taught us, infections can spread quite quickly and Lionel already has a few undead occupants, without rent needing to be paid, in his house without potential ones being created through the party his uncle wants to start.

From http://stagevu.com/img/thumbnail/knlhzclvpchbbig.jpg

The fifties setting is immediately ingenious. The absurdity of such events taking place in a socially well-to-do, humble pie era of New Zealand, moral and refined, makes this splatter comedy and the gruel that takes place funnier. The film takes advantage of the idiosyncratic absurdities of this, and like Bad Taste (1987), plays up its country of origin's culture for humour as well. And it's a splatter comedy with a capital S. What you get in Braindead is the closest thing to carnivalesque in terms of this kind of splatter cinema outside of something of Re Animator (1985). Instead of hierarchy behind turned upside down as in a carnival, the human body is turned upside down in its function and form here. Gunge from an open orifice should not be eaten in custard but is. Legs should not be able to walk by themselves without the torso but a pair do. Intestines can preen at themselves in the bathroom mirror despite having no mind to function for themselves let alone eyes to actually look at themselves. If a severed limb can be used in a comedic way, it will. What is seen in Braindead is foul and twisted, but it's played with in such a comedic deadpan tone that it elicits giggles as well as shock. That it plays with such a serious tone that is yet so easy to find amusing - the use of a radio play within the film for audio related humour shows more of what Jackson clearly wanted the film to be like - makes it better.

From http://www.meangoblin.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/peter-jackson-braindead-a.jpg
It also helps that this was when, frankly, Peter Jackson's films has the most of his personality. Some of the jokes in this final film in his splattick trilogy are just as childish and tasteless as in Bad Taste and Meet The Feebles (1989), such as what is clearly a former Nazi turned drug pushing veterinarian, but he was never pretentious, never sophomoric, and has such an imagination that, alongside friends and other individuals who made these films with him, brought such surprising things to be seen you never though you would see. Say I was spoilt, but Braindead was one of the first of cult horror films I saw when I was eighteen or slightly younger and started searching for them, but most other horror films haven't topped what this film did still. It's not just that the final quarter is the goriest, ridiculous and jaw dropping things I've seen still, including the infamous lawnmower massacre, but that it never lagged before then, as ridiculous in the first three halves, and that it was able to keeping topping what happened earlier on for something even better. You cannot say, even if you say the film's simplistic, that the end peters out or it was a drag to get to the famous end scenes. It makes the romance between Lionel and Paquita legitimately dramatic, and uses the oedipal plot with Lionel's Mum to top everything before the actual climax. I thought, even on another viewing, that it would be impossible to top sequences that left so much fake blood soaked into the set floors that it was still there when everything was cleaned up and other productions were being filmed on it. Somehow Braindead manages to top this with the end of the Oedipal plotline that will leave your jaw on the floor further. The carnivalesque body horror and complete sacrilege displayed with how the body should work and be treated continually goes further and further, managing to not run out of steam halfway through because, like a Looney Tunes cartoon, it is playful and willing to be as surreal even for cheap jokes. Even the repeating kicking in the testicles of the Uncle character, for a cheap overused joke, is still funny on the third time because the set-up for how they happen is as much of the joke too.

From http://images2.fanpop.com/images/photos/6900000/Dead-Alive-aka-Braindead-1992-Stills-horror-movies-6933691-630-335.jpg

There is very much the sense that Jackson couldn't really go further than this. Braindead succeeds majestically, but he made two tasteless and creative films before this and, on the third swing, learnt enough to create a homerun in terms of the final creation. I'll admit this could go against my complete frozen attitude to the more acclaimed Jackson of now, but I am willing to explore the films I've yet to see that have no involvement with J. R. R. Tolkien whatsoever. The thing is, Jackson didn't necessarily need to drop the adolescent but imaginative tone of those early splatter works regardless if he did need to move on. A different tone of horror film could have been enough, but keep his willingness to improvise. Why I may have nearly fallen asleep in rewatching The Fellowship of the Ring (2001) is that Jackson was choosing material, to his detriment, that forced him to have to be as faithful to the original source as possible and not allowed to be the prankster he clearly was with his first films. And frankly, while I will give them a try, hasn't he been making films for the last decade that was adapted from other peoples' work instead of his own ideas? It makes one disappointed that his id has been straight jacketed into being respectable. His first film Bad Taste felt far more like a creation of passion in its ramshackle lunacy and its creativity. Braindead is that film made with more craft and more skill, and I continue to feel resistant about viewing his newer films, even if interest is still there, because it feels like he may have lost the point. 

From http://www.nerdlikeyou.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/brain-dead-entertainment-nerd-like-you-1024x576.jpg

Tuesday, 3 September 2013

T Is For...The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 (1986)

From http://dailygrindhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/The-Texas-Chainsaw-Massacre-2-1986.jpg

Dir. Tobe Hooper

More pulpier and ridiculous than previous entries, this nonetheless shows that any film can be potentially subversive, even one made by Cannon Group. Also there's the likelihood that I'll cover most, if not all, the films in the Texas Chainsaw Massacre series over the following years. At least one will be painful to sit through again, two I've never seen, and yet it won't be as bad as you think, and I will even defend one of them if any.

Review Link - http://www.videotapeswapshop.co.uk/15420/t-is-for-the-texas-chainsaw-massacre-2-1986-director-tobe-hooper/

From http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/10/108875/3034689-0938893114-tcm2b.jpg

Saturday, 6 October 2012

Heroic Bravery, Opening a tin of beans [Bad Taste (1987)]

From http://www.viewclips.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Bad-Taste-1987.jpg

Dir. Peter Jackson
New Zealand
Film #5, for Friday 5th October, of Hallowen 31 for 31

Spare a thought for the poor bastards who don’t work with large, well established groups who deal with extraterrestrial activity like the Men in Black or those who work out of Area 51. The middle America, full of UFO sightings, where either a police force who are not taught to deal with such cases, or a small group of amateur or professional (but unfunded) specialists, have to contact with alien life but get all their credit stolen by FBI agents called Mulder and Sculley when they’ve done all the legwork. Even the most well known version of these tales from Britain, H.G. Welles’s War of the Worlds, inextricably tied to London and the devastation of the nerve centre of South England, has to exist in a British landscape, even then, full of rural countryside populated by farmers and tourists on walking holidays, villages with only one (about to close) post office and little else, and seasides. Martian tripods could easily rise out of the waters of Blackpool beach, or closer to home, Mablethrope seaside, crushing sweet shop stands that sell lollipops in the shape of breasts and penises as well as candy floss and ginger snaps, and disintegrating whole donkey rides and miniature golf players with their heat rays. Who’s going to be there first, before the Army comes in, to deal with the mess?

Spare a thought for Bad Taste’s The Astro Investigation and Defence Service, a New Zealand group who even have to put up with a name so politically incorrect even in 1987 when written as an acronym. Either they have no time to discuss changing it, although one member at a brief point wishes they could, or, dealing with malevolent aliens rampaging around their beautiful but quaint countryside, the sick humour of the name is something to take their minds off said nasties terrifying the sheep and making whole towns of people disappear. Unfortunately, finding the entirety of the population of Kaihoro missing, they have to deal with aliens who want to use human beings as the main food supply for an intergalactic fast food franchise. Never has the terms ‘Heavy Users’ and ‘Super Heavy Users’, from the Morgan Spurlock documentary Super Size Me (2004), been as macabre as when you link them to the activities of the aliens in Bad Taste...

The innocuous nature of Peter Jackson’s first three films – this, Meet The Feebles (1989), and Brain Dead [Dead Alive] (1992) – is a huge factor in why they are as memorable as they are as well as other factors. Even horror-comedy can feel completely disconnected from reality, not a gritty fake world depicted in most realistic dramas, but one full of non-sequiturs, odd tangents and accidental slip-ups that happen in real life. Everyone looks like a model or a plastic composition of what a normal person is, the settings glamorous metropolises (New York, Los Angeles) or cleaned up versions of places, and never would it be conceived that one of the main heroes, with an uzi in hand to take out the mindless hordes, would step in a patch of cow dung and slip like in this film. Bad Taste still has a final chapter that is an extended gun battle, but because of its low budget, its setting, and its jokey and naive tone, such images are pulled up into being inherently silly as well as gripping. That the film is as much a comedy as well as horror, keeping in the boom of ‘splatterstick’ and horror-comedies made in the 1980s, enforces this as it never takes itself seriously. Sight gags, jokes against places within New Zealand, and aliens giving the heroes the middle finger during combat all pile up together in their frivolousness to create something inanely charming. The first three films of Jackson’s, even in the perversity of Meet The Feebles, were able to take such juvenile humour and ideas, and makes them into imaginative, amusingly inane but compelling areas. Brain Dead [Dead Alive] would succeed the most as its 1950s setting and the era’s stereotypical stiltedness already brought a sense of naivety and innocence to the characters and interactions that were invaded by the bloodiest and graphically imaginative gore and zombie attack scenes you could see. That they are New Zealand films, part of the British Commonwealth, does have a lot to say; connections with the British and our use of our own inanity within our most surreal and disgusting jokes is matched by the utter amusement of how Jackson runs with the connections with the British Royalty and our culture within his country, just by the amount of times our current Queen or Prince Charles’ faces appear in such a gory film.

The gore is the most distinctive aspects of Bad Taste, but the virtue of it and Brain Dead is that they are more just decapitations and blood effects continually repeated, but delve into a Carnivalesque mentality where the rules of human anatomy are destroyed, as well as any vindictiveness and cruelty in the violence, and creativity is allowed to sculpt organs, bloods and the body into whatever shape the creators thought would stand out and was possible with the materials they had. Brain Dead stands over some of the best and most regarded horror films for me because it pushes the ghoulishness of gore and anatomy into surrealistic levels – where any body part or organ could move sentiently, or be put together or re-sculpted into any shape – but Bad Taste still shows the same flourishes that would been seen in that film. Case in point would be the predicament that main character Derek (Jackson in one of two roles) has when his skull is broken and he is in constant danger of his brains falling out. The anatomy of the grey matter is slightly suspect even for me and my lack of medical knowledge, but the complete lack of rules is what makes the gorier sequences stand out. And it is not just these scenes to as, despite the low budgeted nature of the film, shades of the camera techniques Jackson would have in his later career and the Lord of the Rings trilogy can be seen in these origins, the elaborate movements at certain moments striking considering how difficult or time consuming some might have been to pull off. They are not up there with where Sam Raimi and his friends went to with The Evil Dead (1981), but the attempts to play with the form of cinema in one’s debut, made over four years, can be seen and are the best virtues of the film. Jackson even has his Derek character and another played by himself who is one of the aliens, fight on top of a cliff, whether out of practicability or to see if he and the rest of the film production team could pull it off, the mirrored doppelganger effect a memorable and applaudable attempt even if it’s obvious how they set the individual shots together to make it work.

My interactions with Jackson’s more acclaimed, later period is cut short. I have not really caught up with them from Heavenly Creatures (1994) onwards, and when I revisited the first of the Lord of the Rings films last year, it was a tedious three hours that put me off the rest of the trilogy. I even fear that Jackson may have lost something that made him distinct in his early splatter period, a potential reason I never caught up with the later films. And yet, aside from the fact that I can still catch up with his work and could end up changing my mind, I can still look at something like Bad Taste with immense satisfaction. Sadly most genre films, regardless of budget, and frankly most films, are lazy and passionless creations, or worse, presume to be creative but end up being pretentious in their mindset. That is a dangerous thing to suggest, especially as judging films is at the end of the day a personal opinion distinct to each viewer, but laziness masquerading as passion is a problem even if its disagreed upon. The sense that the digital camera revolution, while allowing people with creativity to actually have access to making a film, has caused most low budget genre cinema to sink into a hack mentality further than before, as long as nudity and violence is on screen, feels more apparent, even if it’s a distorted bias of mine that hasn’t been fully shown the Video Rental Store of the Damned where films as far back as the 1910s were capable of being half-hearted hackwork. It still cannot hide though those films like Bad Taste which exist and radiate with a clear pride of the filmmakers trying their hardest, something which even outside of filmmaking is worth taking away from. As a person wanting to write and be a writer, whether I can end up writing published novels or am content to post on my blog like this, I want to push myself so the best and most creative work is made. This is why this Halloween project, subconsciously, was started as well as, when I considered it, improving my writing and creative skills outside of hobbies for real world employment. Peter Jackson with Bad Taste clearly wanted to push himself with this film, and like the most well regarded genre films, the large flaws cannot undermine this fact, especially when he went on to make Meet The Feebles and the masterpiece Brain Dead, and successfully raised the bar and made better films. And this is not a hollow mentality that you see in Bad Taste either - the kind that film fans making their own work accidentally channel or celebrate that does not capture a sense of life of what is outside of the cinema - but something that is as much a creation made with life, which factors into its innocuous charm, while still is a genre film for the diehard film fanatics. This sort of filmmaking leads to great reward for the makers and the viewers, and now 26 years old or so, Bad Taste has probably made double the reward for itself.

From http://horrornews.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Bad-Taste-photo-3.jpg