[Note – This will be the last
post, aside from a This Week...
article or two, that I will put up this year. In January this series I am
introducing now will start immediately. Additional Note - Screenshots used in this introduction are from films that may or may not be part of the season.]
There is something odd about me
doing a season on terrible cinema in that I completely detest the concept of
the ‘so-bad-its-good’ film or mocking films like Mystery Science Theatre 3000. A bad film is not a guilty pleasure,
just painful to sit through, while films others would call guilty pleasures are
erratic gems for myself, full of glaring flaws but with virtues as well even if
they were accidental. I am the wrong person to do a thirty one day series on ‘bad’
cinema, but this could be to my advantage as I attempt one with trepidation and
morbid curiosity. I decided to change the series from its original concept – ‘The
Worst to the Worst’ – to ‘The ‘Worst’ of Cinema’, with the intention of
choosing films that, within the categories I have selected, have been dismissed
as awful films. They could be as terrible as their reputations suggest, but
they could turn out to be great or at least far more rewarding then one’s
expectations for them were originally. The three categories that my choices
will be drawn from are simple and to the point –
1. The worst films. Any genre,
any type of films.
2. The films called the worst by
film critics and viewers throughout the decades, including those that have been
critically re-evaluated.
3. Films that I have viewed as
the worst I have seen since I started recording my opinions and scores on the
films I have watched since I was a young adult.
From http://oscarmovs.com/manos2.jpg |
Within these rules, anything can
be reviewed if it qualifies in these categories. Like the last month long
project I did in October, I have rules for how to do the series. This time I
have the previous experience to help me modify them.
From http://filmdump.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/showgirls-2.jpg |
A. Real life if more important. If
I miss days, I will make up for it in February so thirty one reviews are posted
up.
B. I will try to keep the balance
between rewatches and first time viewings right, so I can have immediate reactions
and second opinions together. With the films I had as my worst viewing
experiences to be re-reviewed within public blog writing, there is going to be
a few more rewatches then last time.
C. No Birdemic: Shock and Terror (2010), The Room (2003), or anything from The Asylum or on the Syfy
channel. They go against my desired goal to make this an open minded excavation
of the critical scrag big, with any jokes made side-by-side with them secondary,
rather than a cheap excuse to mock instant ‘cult’ classics.
D. Just because a film is
included in the series doesn’t mean I will give it a bad review. Even if it is
a negative review, it’s better to agree to disagree rather than argue about it.
Any negative critiques and jokes at a film’s expense are my personal opinion
only.
Again with this season, I have
not included a set list of films, but there are many potential candidates to
choose from, too many for the thirty one slots. I hope to have as eclectic a
collection of reviews as I did with the Halloween
31 For 31 series, with a further advantage that the subjective ‘worst’ of cinema
can be even more diverse then the entire horror genre, not also taking into
account how horror films by themself are a significant slice of this concept in
film viewing. When the series starts on the 1st January and the New
Year, I dread what I can dig up to review, but hope that amongst the lunacy and
bad parody films that I will learn an important message from all of this. Whether
my masochistic viewing tastes will protect me during this experience will
depend on how legible my typing is by the end of this all and whether I don’t
have nightmares about Troll 2 (1990)
and the ilk.
From http://www.anime-planet.com/images/anime/screenshots/rootssearch1.jpg |
No comments:
Post a Comment