Friday, 12 October 2012

I've got an Ape Head, Yes I do... [Night of the Bloody Apes (1969)]

Regardless of the review, this cover has a ramshackle charm.
From http://thatwasabitmental.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/night-of-the-bloody-apes-gorgon-vhs-front.jpg

Dir. René Cardona
Mexico
Film #11, of Thursday 11th October, for Halloween 31 For 31

Simians across the world can breathe a sigh of relief. Taking a time machine back to 1969, they see the only gorilla-to-human transplant to ever take place suffer from a setback when, as a father secretly performs the operation on his dying son, it causes the younger man to transform into a half beast creature who rips men apart, and tears the clothing off and assaults the (mostly red headed) female cast. Now the global ape population can gloat as the porcine mammals the pigs were discovered to be appropriate organ donors, asking such in-poor taste questions as ‘if a man has a pig’s heart surgically placed in his body, does eating a bacon sandwich after quality as cannibalism?’ to mock them.

Also connect into this a subplot about a female lucha libre wrestler who is having setbacks in her career choice. Her boyfriend is pursuing the man-beast, so she passes by in the main story with no direct participation in it, exactly how this sort of event involving man-beasts would happen in real life. I have to question though, despite my lack of knowledge on Mexican wrestling, why she walks around in public without her mask on. Is it a custom only practiced by male wrestlers like Santo, or have I gotten the codes of Mexican wrestling wrong? Maybe if going into a hospital to see your hospitalised opponent from the ring, it’s polite to take the mask off like a hat? I need someone to inform me on the rules on this in full detail.

A long time passes until a man-ape appears on screen and a while until he gets momentum and gets a body count going. The film looks promising in the opening credits with Eastmancolor red gore dripping on black card, but the film’s rudimentary creation is exposed by how lumbering its pace is. You may question the morals of entertaining yourself with gushings of blood and quasi-sexual molestation acted out on screen by the ape-man – ‘quasi’ not in a dubious way to offend any female readers, but because the man-ape is baffled by how to lay on another person let alone consider taking his pants off – but exploitation films exist to promote the basest of humanity. Some are masterpieces or gems who use this to provoke powerful emotions, others as far back as the beginning of cinema just to show female nudity and blood being spilt. If they cannot pace themselves well or engage the particular viewer through their nudity and gore is useless. You can go see other films with as much, or more, of these things that are better made or more interesting. The fickleness of genre cinema is that it can produce films more-to-the-point and intelligent than overbearing award fodder, the termite arts able to hobble the lumbering white elephants with bites full of enough critical re-evaluation and cult praise to take down ten more, but it has to sacrifice so many of its own kind, making them into tedious cheap products, to make this happen. That more bad films exist in the hundreds compared to good films is an established rule, but it seems like a sick joke when pointed out in genre cinema, especially horror cinema. It has been picked on, dismissed as trash and laughed at by critics in the cinematic playground, a cheap target when the more popular dramas in the class get away with things incomprehensible in the manners of quality film making. Something like Night of the Bloody Apes, for me at least, does not help things.

The ape-man does his best – like David Banner if he didn’t turn green and developed a very hairy noggin instead – with eye trauma the Italians would be proud of, but the film is tedious. It plods along, never getting to even cheap titillation that snaps you in with its illicitness or grossness. For Mexico’s entry in the Video Nasties list for the United Kingdom, it’s another film off it that really does not stand up when The Evil Dead (1981), Possession (1981), Inferno (1980) and the rest of the critically acclaimed entries that were banned outright or temporarily are sat next to it. In an uncomfortable place between the rich 1960s colours and paint red blood of Hershell Gordon Lewis and the scuzzier 1970s films, it doesn’t take advantage of both worlds very well.

And yet, even though this film was excruciating to sit through, I want to leave on a positive light and show the four good things I got from the viewing :-

1) As someone who grew up watching wrestling, and for a brief but great year or so a whole channel dedicated to wrestling, it was great to see the lucha libre sequences. And for anyone who only grew up with the WWF/WWE Divas like me who wandered around shaking their bottoms and could only throw pissy hip tosses, the sight of stocky masked women throwing forearms and snapmeres with enough force to probably batter a man who was dumb enough to fight them was refreshing.

2) One interesting editing flourish, which the Nucleus Films DVD uses as a menu transition, is that to progress to the next scene the film sometimes has shots of a camera going along a wall covered in multicolour paint. Who painted this rainbow coloured wall? Whoever it was they deserve some credit for one of the most memorable parts of the film.

3) I have to talk about the use of real heart transplant surgery footage, probably the biggest reason this film may have been put on the Video Nasties list. Considering this possibility, it actually adds another shame about the whole 1984 Video Recording Act fiasco and the banning of these films. A life saving procedure that happens countless times in real life and yet, regardless of its dubious placement in a Mexican exploitation film, we are shocked when a scene of a real person’s body being cut open is shown, his heart extracted while it’s still beating, a crimson mass of pure muscle I have never seen in this detail except with any footage involving this film, and think it’s going too far. Regardless of my negative opinions of the film, that it’s an Mexican exploitation film that’s willing to show a real life medical procedure, the sight of the blood squirting out shocking but levelled by the anatomical beauty of the organs and flesh of the human body, deserves praise on the behalf of director René Cardona and contempt for respectable people who sweep these images under the metaphorical rug.

4) Along with natural blonde hair on women, I have a lust and passion rich for naturally red hair too, making the largely fiery maned female cast eye-catching for me. So shoot me...

From http://s3.amazonaws.com/auteurs_production/images/film/night-of-the-bloody-apes/w448/night-of-the-bloody-apes.jpg?1299220056

No comments:

Post a Comment