From http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m65j76Bvlx1qzq9v4o1_500.jpg |
Dir. Nick Zedd
USA
From http://s3.amazonaws.com/auteurs_production/images/film/they-eat-scum/w448/they-eat-scum.jpg?1289659829 |
To someone who does not love or
admire They Eat Scum, a barrage of
criticisms could be rained down. It looks cheap they would say, amateurish,
badly acted, not good in terms of structure, and just tastelessly disgusting. It
was clearly made out of Nick Zedd’s
own resources yes, and it does quality as amateur cinema, but “amateur” is not
an inherently negative word, and viewing this film, I myself have to reassess
how I use that word from now on. An amateur creation can be far more
interesting than the “professionally” made work. That’s why the term
underground art was created for and creations within said term have knocked to
the kerb overground creations in terms of quality. It was the creation of a New
York based movement known as the Cinema of Transgression, made with what was
available at hand and, with Zedd as
one of the main individuals of it and a manifesto writer, making intentionally provocative
and tasteless films designed to startle and amuse. Truly cheap, awful work is
lifeless, lazy rehashing of generic tropes ad nauseum or pretend to be
intentionally bad with no charm. They
Eat Scum is the opposite to all this, keeping with its punk rock content in
terms of mindset rather than being a dull gooffest. When a character, so enamoured
with man’s best friend, sucks off their male poodle, people will raise their
eyebrows to this differentiation but tastelessness needs creativity and a sense
of craftsmanship, at any level, to work. Nothing in this film is half-hearted
and contrived, but feels like a gleeful poke in the eyes that works whether you
reveal in it or feel like you’ve got poodle spunk in your mouth.
From http://images.undergroundfilmjournal.com/wp-images/timeline/they_eat_scum_zedd.jpg |
Episodic, it is centred on the actress
Donna Death and starts off with a
family – Death as the daughter, who
is the lead singer of a famous death rock band who encourages a death cult of
cannibals out of her fans, a son with a “very” close relationship to his pet
poodle, and a very religious father. From there you go through shady managers,
canine prostitution, ritualistic genital mutilation, twin sisters, chaos and
digs at disco that, far from being cruel jokes in this newer era, are actually
funny and leads to one of the best moments which the quote of the review’s title
is from. It’s also, as mentioned, a celebration of punk music, including filmed
performances of punk bands in their messy audio glory. I wonder if Zedd saw Jubilee (1978) and was directly inspired by it, Derek Jarman’s anarchic series of
vignettes about the growing punk culture at the time and made in a way just as
antagonistic and intentionally ramshackle as They Eat Scum is meant to be. It’s the unpredictability that makes They Eat Scum rewarding. Only seventy
or so minutes long, it never drags into the mire of tedious plotting. It has no
hesitance in its content and has no issue using music, such as the Beach Boys’ Good Vibrations, that may have not been paid for. It even
introduces, unexpectedly, a scene of stop motion animation that was my personal
highlight of the film just for the sake of it.
From http://img.rp.vhd.me/4627840_l2.jpg |
And it is fun. Shot on Super 8,
it is the product of a decade before where a micro budget film automatically
brings up the image of something interesting or at least worth seeing (usually)
than a cheap zombie/slasher film or CGI sharks. It was intended to shock the
viewer or gives some un-PC entertainment to those who got the joke, and its
do-it-yourself, take-no-prisoners aesthetic is ultimately rewarding.
From http://i2.ytimg.com/vi/iA2DlxbREys/mqdefault.jpg |
No comments:
Post a Comment