Monday, 19 August 2013

A New [Linguistic] Adventure: Chompa Toung (1974)

From http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-53BOqh7KR2I/UCmscw1NGbI/
AAAAAAAAHFc/Ytov09xjLc8/s1600/CHT01.jpg
Dir. Lim Buh Lun [Or] Dy Saveth

Maybe I should have actually read the blog review that first introduced me to this film and the closest to a full version to view it. The blog, Die Danger Die Die Kill, is a recent discovery of mine, and now thanks to it my scale for world cinema has drastically increased more than before. So many films you'd probably be only able to find online in terrible rips. Ones that may perish forever one day because no one cares about anything without prestige even if they  could say a lot about a country as much as the art house films do. I want to see as many of them as I can before they do perish or if the interweb gets crabby about people uploading said films. But I should have read that he had to view a un-subtitled version to actually see it, and that it is ninety percent dialogue. The result of this is what would happen if someone who is monolinguist, me only able speak English in my cretinous mindset, trying to watch a dialogue heavy drama, with some fantastical elements, without any real idea what was going on except facial expressions and intonation. And this is the first film I've seen from Cambodia, introducing me to their culture and their language for the first time cinematically. I can register Japanese from all the films and animation I've seen. I'm able to distinguish German thanks to the East German dialects of the band Rammstein. But hearing Cambodian and how it sounds meant I had to adapt to it for the first time. Without subtitles it actually made the sense of listening to the language, rather than reading text at the bottom of the screen, and still watching the images above, more significant. I confess I blanked through many parts of the film, but it was quite an enlightening experience I should do more often. The results of having no subtitles is twofold. The first is that facial expressions became something I had to pay dividends to more so than usual, realising how far too dependable I am as a Western viewer to subtitles at times with my film viewing to explain everything. Even if I didn't get a lot of what the film was about, I no longer neglected the importance of facial expression in communication, even when it got very hammy even without the subtitles. Secondly, the language becomes a series of aural rhythms by itself, able to appreciate the sounds of the language and speech for once, backed up by a score that ping-ponged from traditional instruments to funk, psychedelic wah-wah guitar.

What I can gather, in terms of information on the plot, is that it's based on a Cambodian folk tale. A princess, Chompa Toung, played by Dy Saveth who may have been the director too explaining the confusion in the credit at the beginning of the review, is introduced. When she laughs, flower petals literally flow from out of her mouth. She is given a crocodile's egg as a gift, but when it's an adult the beast becomes a man-eater who ends up being let loose and attacks people in the village her family presides over. Taking the blame, she sacrifices herself to the crocodile, but a heavenly being literally stood on top of the clouds intervenes and saves her, his magic depicted as lines actually scratched into the celluloid itself. This is where the whole folk tale, having read it after viewing the film, ends, but the adaptation goes further.  It becomes much more difficult to follow but things can be established. With a pet kitten turning into a woman to be her aide, Toung ventures out into the world after being saved, finding a new place to be her home when the two are caught by a stream by a giant. Possibly a supernatural king, or just a regular one connected with the giant, rules the new home, and she now possesses a new place of luxury to live life in. A prince takes interest in her, siring a superhumanly strong son, but in I how I interpret what happens, a group of young women, four exactly, take immense displeasure in this relationship, and with some outsider help, cloud his mind and push Chompa Toung out of the way. With a bumbling potential lover from her old home, and a lot of scenes of people kowtowing in royal halls, and moments where the kings have contemplative or scrunched up faces like the famous statue of the Thinker, this mess is somehow resolved.

From https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj4WjQPGTg1VQd93GAdYzdD6H2GtkvNuZ0uxq7frraWftUwTE8642KUKfsJbnE_s2XzPD-U4eBF2l0UPR83hejXKlxv8uE10QmRAqbJbdW50MiIbEUackWC9SlBrzM2rlOJKBhrMujO4Qw/s320/CHT05.jpg

There is a strong possibility that the lack of subtitles actually makes this of any reward rather than the actual story. It could still be entertaining if I understood it all, but with the closest thing comparable to it being a melodrama crossed with fantasy, it has a lot of dialogue but not necessary any melodramatics or drama just from the visual content. It's not visually splendid either even considering the rough looking version I saw. Almost all the film for that ninety percent of time is actually people sat in lavish rooms talking. Sitting in front of important people, kowtowing, talking more, maybe offering a gift or an accusation, more kowtowing, rinse wash and repeat. Its great education for how to behave in front of Cambodian mythological royalty, but my lack of knowledge of the language scuppers me from trying to grasp the narrative after the first part based on the folk tale. There is as much a possibility that it's a terrible film for a native Cambodian film fan, believing dialogue is of importance but forgetting it needs to be cinematic and compelling. Without the language barrier, what could be a dull mess, although not a lot of people could watch any film in another language then theirs without subtitles, actually becomes engaging by being completely lost in it and having to notice how the actors speak. At points it's a fantasy film too, supernatural in the way I thought the whole film would be going into it. Honestly, a fantasy film which was continually set pieces after set pieces, with what practical effects were available to the production, can travel onto YouTube to many other countries without subtitles. It's not a case of it being a bad or a good film, or an insulting trivialisation of a country through its low budget genre filmmaking, but in preferable the best case examples, a sincere enjoyment in seeing a country rarely talked about in terms of cinema trying its hand at these existing genres and melding their own traditions and ideas to them. Viewing your cousins from the other side of the world and how they'd tackle anything from a fantasy melodrama like this or reinterpreting Star Wars. The deity in the clouds is a male actor superimposed on top of clouds. The giant is another male actor who, thanks to superimposition, is made gigantic compared to everyone else. A jump cut turns a cat into a human woman. The crocodile is a very fake one on the water, or is part of the many pieces of footage clearly borrowed from nature documentaries, dark blue on the battered and buggered VHS rip I viewed, spliced into the film. There was even an accidental effect in the version I viewed which actually added to it, an accident in the transfer of the film on tape where it blurs and, breaking the fourth wall, you see the literal celluloid film at a distance you are watching, adding to the off kilter tone.   

Whether one could find a lot truly entertaining or not is up to debate. But I must confess that, in an age where there are still so many films unavailable, and many without people to subtitle them yet, I've become more braver in trying to watch films which I have no understanding of the language at all. Chompa Toung was an extreme because most of it was just dialogue, but that made it an unique experience in its own right. I would be grateful as well to see a subtitled version too even if its the same jiggered looking version I've already seen. Its best for you the reader to try viewing it yourself. I will post the review from the blog Die Danger Die Die Kill here - http://diedangerdiediekill.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/chompa-toung-cambodia-1974.html .

There is a link within it to the version of the film I viewed. After that it's up to your own opinion.

From https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi3qePwFcZzHDBZpOUyANqfPJfTilF3ddX7XC4Bm5ybsIQHEYEzLWOyrDm3fkQ_Wec50EvgilDPW7szcU-BTWLdMl9-uYPqjKfCceys9EeRoXVDSN0NcUI4szvytS6RJsFRF53DiNLjsZg/s320/CHT02.jpg

Sunday, 18 August 2013

I Is For... The Idiots

From https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRcyEsUfzSblHSgximtQa30RKApLJD-K7YqKT5pbRNm6oE3_50fB5VwbR-6-Njz2XJIEiniR6KDvcITFfwTHSCGXHzDeMRmsJrs48R4C49nChqjmujI2dcb0hw128sQoI9xqjFnmfd54ea/s640/idioterne-original.jpg
Dir. Lars von Trier


This is probably one of the most personal pieces I've written, but considering the subject matter, it felt appropriate to bring in some of my own personal life into it. The only other thing I can say is that there were too many flags to be able to put them all up. A co-production between six countries, it'll be insane to stick that many into such a small piece. I'll just stick with the Danish one and have the others in the labels.


Review Link - http://www.videotapeswapshop.co.uk/16026/i-is-for-the-idiots-1998-director-lars-von-trier/

From http://i1143.photobucket.com/albums/n627/worldscinema/2nakapz.jpg

Saturday, 17 August 2013

H Is For... The Holy Mountain (1973)

From http://professormortis.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/holymountain.jpg

Dir. Alejandro Jodorowsky

That Jodorowsky hasn't made that many films is both surprising and not. The former because he is the sort of person who could have channeled his ideas into countless films. The later because he's style of filmmaking would not be acceptable to a producer not wanting the director to take any of the risks or to make a film as far out as this. Tusk (1980), which I want to track down as a die hard fan of his, is said to be what happened when he was straightjacketed from making his own vision. A miserable failure. Thankfully this year, as a much older and wiser man, if his reflections on these older films are to go by, his newest one The Dance of Reality (2013) got a premiere at Cannes with very warm reception. I can only hope it does get released in Britain , preferably within the year but just to see it would be great.


As for his other films? After this review, don't be surprised if I try to tackle the others at some point.

Review Link - http://www.videotapeswapshop.co.uk/15056/h-is-for-the-holy-mountain-1973-director-alejandro-jodorowsky/

From http://schlockfootage.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/holy-mountain-la-montana-sagrada-0.jpg

Stoker (2013) vs. The Stepfather (1987)

From http://itsblogginevil.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/stepfather871.jpg

From http://zombiehamster.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/STOKER-4.jpeg

Dir. Park-Chan Wook/Joseph Ruben

So many coincidences take place in life that surely it happens in your film viewing too. I finally caught up with Park-Chan Wook's American debut one night, then the next night I saw the cult horror film The Stepfather. In the first, after the death of the father, the unknown uncle (Matthew Goode) enters the remaining family only to reveal a sinister side of him that startles the daughter (Mia Wasikowska), a girl who herself has a potential dark side. In the later, the daughter (Jill Schoelen) suspects that her stepfather (Terry O'Quinn) is more than he says he is, obsessed with having the perfect family. Unlike Stoker, it's made upfront that there's some psychopathic behaviour being thrown about in the first few minutes. One high prestige film from a South Korean alumni, one love budget Canadian film. It's amazing Stoker can be traced back to the later...and that its completely pretentious and barely watchable in comparison. Neither is good, but at least The Stepfather has a lack of strained artistry.


Both films involve a revelation taking place for the young, female protagonist near the ice cream freezer in the cellar. Both involve the sexualisation of them in the shower. In The Stepfather its brief nudity that could be either an establishing shot or an abrupt moments of titillation in a film that is only adult in its occasional gore. In Stoker it's a scene linking sex, death, and death fantasies through masturbation that, depicted with all the subtlety of a sledgehammer, made me want to punch Park-Chan Wook and scriptwriter Wentworth Miller. Both replications perfectly describe the films together. The Stepfather is lurid genre cinema that yet is completely relaxed and comfortable with what it is. Stoker protracts these moments found in other genre films like The Stepfather, and strains so badly to be "high art". Both depict a conventional nuclear family - mother, daughter, a new father figure - after the passing the original father and being replaced by a surrogate who is an invading parasite of masculine and patriarchal ideals. In The Stepfather, the desire for the peaceful, quaint happy families of magazines and fifties America. In Stoker, mental and psychological disconnect and sociopathic desires. In Stoker, there is nothing profound in its dialogue to support its excessive stylisation, hollow and without tension, and without any gravitas. The Stepfather is a generic horror film, but it has so no sense of pretention whatsoever.

From http://s.mcstatic.com/thumb/7613400/20760803/4/flash_player/
0/1/the_stepfather_1987_attacking_stephanie_part_2.jpg?v=4

From http://thatfilmguy.net/Pics/Stoker.jpg

To The Stepfather's advantage, it has charm. While with a type of recluse anti-social young adult character who exists in reality, Wasikowska is completely unlikable and uninteresting. Completely overdone in being anti-social, and because of the complete lack of good characterisation,  she's also completely vacuous. The depiction of her growing dark side just emphasises an uncomfortable and childish fetish for violence, that shower sequence representing its nadir. It also causes me to worry about rewatching some of the Park-Chan Wook's earlier films, especially Oldboy (2004) and how violent and twisted in its plot it gets. With Schoelen in The Stepfather, you get a character, while one dimensional, who is charming, likely because the real actress was off-set. It's a generic character, but she's allowed to smile, isn't stuck in an overwrought, unoriginal take on Expressionist set design or with violence taking place every minute around her. Her mother is charming despite her one note nature too and has more interaction with her daughter. Nicole Kidman in Stoker shows what happens when a Hollywood actress feels their prescience is enough when it doesn't, making me wish all her films were like Lars von Trier's Dogville (2003) where she was forced to actually act. In the surrogates, O'Quinn is far more interesting than Goode. O'Quinn could be seen as hammy, but his character's obsession could have made a fascinating black comedy around how he acts the role out. Goode comes off as a bad version of what Casey Affleck does so well in films like The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford (2007), an uncomfortably confident, quiet male who has the potential to be charming but is liable to snap as well. Even if I hated The Killer Inside Me (2010), Michael Winterbottom's controversial novel adaptation, Affleck did this type of role properly with real emphasis. And unlike Stoker, in The Stepfather the boys in the protagonist's school are not all potential rapists the moment you are alone with them. While I'm not a fan of a lot of eighties horror films, there was some sort of attempt in many at likable teenagers. It was only generic storytelling that failed them, not the actual characterisations.

Ultimately the coincidences prove an unfortunate truth that some films are completely identical to dismissed b-movies, and that they can be far worse and lifeless than said b-movies. I wasn't that fond of The Stepfather, but it has more virtues. It knew what it was, and had charm for that reason. The protagonist had some charisma, and a subplot involving her psychiatrist/councillor invokes a brief but tantalising moment when he gets to examine her stepfather's mind. And while I've forgotten Stoker's score, baffling consideration it was composed by Clint Mansell, the score in it is the cheesy synths that I've developed an un-guilty love for. Stoker becomes the poor man's b-movie in that it tries to think its above one but doesn't have the material to judge itself even next to one. Prolonged gore with no weight and a po-faced darkness. The casual lack of seriousness to The Stepfather turns out to be the more artistically mature attitude to making a film because it's a b-movie that knows it's one and just tries to entertain.

From http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4050/4583515050_68f8892046_z.jpg

From http://www.moviefancentral.com/images/pictures/review29390/matthewgoode-nicolekidman-miawasikowska-STOKER.jpg?1367185181

Friday, 16 August 2013

G Is For... Gamer (2009)

From http://www.deepakarora.info/wp-content/gallery/movies/gamer.jpg

Dirs. Neveldine/Taylor

Another film covered by this duo. I do believe, like a lot of film fans, that they are underrated and far more interesting than many other film makers that work in the same genre in terms of presentation and content of their work. I'll argue Gamer is the most rewarding film they've made for the reasons stated in the review. I only wished that they'll be working on another film again, but after Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance (2012), we may have to wait a while for that sadly.


From http://www.visualhollywood.com/movies_2009/gamer/posters/wallpaper_006.jpg

Wednesday, 14 August 2013

F Is For... Flaming Creatures (1963)

From http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/db/Flaming_Creatures.jpg/220px-Flaming_Creatures.jpg

Dir. Jack Smith

The only issue, posting this link up, is that the films of the late Jack Smith are not in availability outside of rare screenings. I'm only lucky to see his most famous film thanks to it being legally streamed on UBU.com, but even if the original film was intentionally murky, its probably a VHS rip. From my small bit of knowledge, Smith was known for re-editing and modifying his cinematic creations, which would make collecting the official versions together on DVD difficult, but it would be great to see a full length version, in a good print, of Normal Love (1963) which is only a fragment on UBU.com as well. One wishes the right person was reading this and could click their fingers to make it magically happen.


From http://blog.calarts.edu/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/flaming-creatures-2.jpg

Tuesday, 13 August 2013

Mini-Review: Dead Hooker in a Trunk (2009)

From http://www.brutalashell.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Dead-Hooker-In-A-Trunk-DVD-art1-e1306338980540.jpg

Dirs. Jen Soska and Sylvia Soska

Very rarely does anyone become instantly good at their work the first attempt. Just because I'm writing about genre films here doesn't mean I've instantly become Kim Newman. Likewise, Dead Hooker In A Trunk should be seen as the first steps for the directors Jen Soska and Sylvia Soska, that shows how they managed to get a film created amongst themselves and with a small group in the film, and pushed them along to be potentially great in the future. As an actual film, its only worth viewing as a beginning attempt.

It's very unfocused. Four characters, the Geek (Jen Soska), the Junkie (Rikki Gagne), the Badass [sic] (Sylvia Soska), and the Goody Two Shoes (C.J. Wallis), a Christian volunteer and the sole male pulled into this situation, find themselves on a bloody odyssey when they find a literal hooker in the trunk of their car. There are plenty of surreal journeys taking place in films. Likewise, there are a lot of films made by young directors that are about the frivolous gore and tangents, Street Trash (1987) coming to mind. Unfortunately this film comes across like so many movies in which, no matter how it tries to be inventive, the content of the film and its practical gore effects are padded around a work that has no idea where it is going. It comes off as not really trying its hardest, almost abandoning the titular point of the thin story halfway through with a short, abrupt introduction of Chinese gangsters that go away immediately afterwards. Later plotting is just trying to plug holes up in a tone that has no real drive to it and is sinking quickly from the beginning. It attempts to bring the unexpected to the content, but comes off as messy without any effect. Only a few films can make this tone work, by utter accident or on purpose like with Frank Henelotter films, but that's because the tangents do have an immense effect on you or the entire narrative pulls on to keep you on your toes. This tries its best at its tasteless tone - never has limb loss been treated so matter-of-fact like it was a paper cut - but like the minor, tedious genre films which try a gonzo edge it feels like bad improvisation.


Visually, its unfortunately another low budget film shot on digital cameras which has to sacrifice its cinematic quality for cost. The shaking cameras through, always shaking even in dialogue sequences when they shouldn't, aren't as bad though as the mistakes in the editing, which botches a few key, sudden moments into practical effects to the point you briefly have no idea what is going for a second or two. Thankfully American Mary (2012) was the directors' film directly after this. It's far from perfect, and it's kind of startling how both films, from female directors, have a lot of violence against women especially in Dead Hooker In A Trunk, but it was a massive jump in quality. No abrasive use of loud rock or metal songs, potentially good if listened to separately but too high in the mix and not properly synchronised to the images and movements, a drastic shift up in the look of the film, and more importantly, really interesting ideas within the plot. In fact that film gives me hope the Soska Sisters will start to make some exceptionally good movies now they're jumped this high in quality already. I'm not going to give Dead Hooker In A Trunk a pass though, just because it's their debut, when its clearly lacking and more of a failed sketch of an idea they would improve on later on.

From http://media.jinni.com/movie/dead-hooker-in-a-trunk/dead-hooker-in-a-trunk-1.jpeg