Sunday, 8 September 2013

W Is For…Wax, Or The Discovery Of Television Among The Bees (1991)

From http://sharetv.org/images/posters/wax_or_the_discovery_of_television_among_the_bees_1992.jpg

Dir: David Blair

I will openly admit my gratefulness for the internet. The director of this film has, thankfully, released a hypertext version of this film on his own site, but the original feature film version of Wax... is difficult to find. I confess I am grateful for the internet for making it possible for me to view and review this film, hoping that one day a version is released more commercially for more people to be able to see it. Its the kind of film you want to discover and talk about on a film blog, and even if its a small review, I hope this encourages more people to go out and track it down. Maybe if enough people are interested Wax... could get a great reappraisal from attention like this.



Review Link - http://www.videotapeswapshop.co.uk/15720/w-is-for-wax-or-the-discovery-of-television-among-the-bees-%E2%80%93-1991-director-david-blair/

From http://b.vimeocdn.com/ts/123/541/12354136_640.jpg

Saturday, 7 September 2013

Mini-Review: Carnival of Souls (1998)

From http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTIwMTAzMjIwM15BMl5BanBn
XkFtZTcwMzIwNDgxMQ@@._V1_SY317_CR4,0,214,317_.jpg

Dirs. Adam Grossman (and Ian Kessner)

The late nineties in my mind seemed to have an obsession with evil clowns and ringmasters, circuses and carnivals places you'd likely encounter something nasty rather than just throwing up on the rollercoaster. I remember an arcade game I sadly never got to play, the scrolling shooter CarnEvil (1998). KISS had their reunion album based on a "Psycho Circus", and at some point the Insane Clown Posse became a legitimate cult born from the Juggalo consciousness. Baring in mind Carnival of Souls is about pretty serious subject matter, which I don't want to trivialise, you have to wonder if some people had really bad experiences about carnival rides and some really slimy clowns working in the circus back then. Technically, this is a remake of the 1962 cult film of the same name. Both are drastically different aside from the type of ending they share, and I need to see the original film again. Wes Craven is immensely varying for me, (possibly?) described as having the trajectory of a narcoleptic on a trampoline in terms of his films high and low qualities, made worse by the fact that I don't like The Last House on the Left (1972), The Hills Have Eyes (1977) or Scream (1996), so having him merely presenting this film has no interest. The only real draw of this film is remaking the original in the form that, from its DVD cover, it looks like you're getting Hellraiser, late nineties-style, mixed with a heavy metal mentality. Said cover doesn't really suggest what Carnival of Souls actually is.

Alex Grant (Bobbie Phillips) has been traumatised since childhood by the murder of her mother by child molester and carnival worker Louis Seagram (Larry Miller). An encounter with him when she grows up into an adult leads to a series of disorientating events where reality is completely disjointed for her. Chronology and place is liable to switch, and she believes Louis is stalking her despite the fact he may no longer exist. A carnival, near the bar her late mother owned and she kept onto, proves to be an ominous site and she occasionally sees horrifying, fleshy demons that no one else could see. The film is bad. Tired and bored. It's the perfect example of how a "mindbender" film, which un-anchors chronology, place and perception, is done badly and sloppily. Someone can argue a film like David Lynch's INLAND EMPIRE (2006) is pretentious, but its design in distorting the concept of reality is still a masterpiece in craftsmanship. The best films in terms of design, placing the actual content to the side for another debate, are those which usually greatly divide audiences, where you are as lost as the protagonist and feel every sensation in terms of the distortion. The shifts in time in Carnival of Souls are laboured, trying to keep the viewer on their toes but with no sense of forcing you to be in the protagonist's shoes. It's like a generic blueprint, or a crude drawing with obvious flaws, being compared to a perfect illustration which weaves every part together. When it tries to include scares into its narrative as well, it feels pathetic and signposted, knowing the scare will happen, and that its actually not scary despite the prosthetics, making it lame instead. It's cheap jump scares with abrupt pop-ups by fleshy demons, and the actually story never goes anywhere as well. With this tone to the film throughout its narrative, it really starts to test one's patience.

Visually it looks flat, flat in a way of a TV movie which doesn't take any interest in the visual quality of the material as its being depicted onscreen, especially one that was originally designed to go to the cinema. On a positive note it also points to the fact that the last years of the nineties, which I thought could still be contemporary, are very much of their era, not in that they've dated badly, but that aesthetically even 1999 feels like a different decade. Looking back at it, even at moments of cringe worthy pop culture, is inherently fascinating even with a film like this that is very limited in its locations and narrative. However that does not defend how bland the film actually looks. Bland is the perfect way to describe it all baring some early computer effects. Bland is the perfect way to describe the entire film. The story, despite its serious content, never grabs you and when the ending comes about it has no effect. The result is completely unemotional, and with its carnival aesthetic it squanders it for bad drama and riffing on the demons of Hellraiser pointlessly. It presents nothing interesting and is completely forgettable, a scrap of an idea that drastically needed a great amount of craft on it to make it work. It needed to be at least a cheesy film about creepy clowns and where even the candy floss is suspicious, not something that tries to be extremely serious but is so unknowing about the level of quality needed to make it work.

From http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-39vjnjTq3D4/Tv0ipNzxxVI/
AAAAAAAAIjw/rs7SpKBlMTc/s640/Carnival+of+Souls+1998+4.png

Friday, 6 September 2013

V Is For...Vixen! (1968)

From http://www.impdb.org/images/e/ee/Vixen1.jpg

Dir. Russ Meyer

My third ever Russ Meyer film, and he is very much his own entirely unique director. It was great to cover something like this in the series because an idiosyncratic director, even if they made exploitation films, could be unconventional and confrontational even where revealing in the nudity.



From https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhtMgIiCoeFHMFbGF2Y0csrgDp397_3PgqbSljdxRmVTqN05ovxfGqkrX68Af8x96QVDzhRi3esupTUjMWYzZDqlvbZ8Vn11N7xVRQHtmEhox5loqMnEGdvq-hoUeHOcQXftdtmi18t9p3P/s400/vixen.jpg

U Is For...Underwater Love (2011)

From https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjgGOBQe-cOqUkxT1FKOnFtiAz8RrTMTqkXW8tHtELj7_3ExQ1K1xVZABPK5Km-8nTFkdBEfqbaA7lcIO7lbXqt80Y31wmN-KP1cKramnsTwdwOPYw2jc7vf-3tOBQ3SEaXqgD53u60Q5U/s1600/Undlo.jpg

Dir. Shinji Imaoka

Something a little pink, a little tasty, and fun. Erotica is worth covering and worth viewing in general, but its good to see one that was just fun and light. Admittedly its release in the UK from Third Window Pictures was a limited release of a certain amount of copies, but I'm grateful for it and the bonus soundtrack CD of Stereo Total's score in the same case. It will be interesting to see where this area of Japanese genre cinema goes when I dig deeper into it. Some of it I am hesitant about viewing. Some it will hopefully be great. Some of it will be incredibly well made and good looking. But I will gladly look into more of Shinji Imaoka's work at least.


Review Link - http://www.videotapeswapshop.co.uk/15609/u-is-for-underwater-love-%E2%80%93-2011-director-shinji-imaoka/

From http://fantasiafestival.com/transfert/2011films/Underwater%20Love%201.jpg

Tuesday, 3 September 2013

The Curse of Kazuo Umezu (1990)

From http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/K8LOCE1mMko/hqdefault.jpg

Dir. Naoko Omi

There's a surprising lack of horror anime in existence. Even in the golden era of straight-to-video anime in the eighties and nineties, where in most cases it was of higher production quality than TV series and could get away with more adult content, there was a rare amount of them only. Now, with these straight-to-video works, OVAs, sorely missed and needed to be brought back, there's a gap left what can be released. Films are rarely made already, let alone horror ones. TV series have restrictions in content, and even those which have shocked Western viewers like Elfen Lied (2004) were probably censored on broadcast or showed past midnight. Only hentai could get away with more horror related content; its already porn, so aside from certain Japanese laws, you could probably get away with more. Manga is usually where horror thrives, slowly being dripped into the West in bookstores. As for those rare horror anime that do exist, The Curse of Kazuo Umezu is a truly rare one, which I only discovered the existence of within a few weeks. It's not even included in the version I've read of The Anime Encyclopedia by Helen McCarthy and Jonathan Clements, which catalogues every anime ever made from 1917 including all the hentai tapes. Its existence, once released on video in its home country in 1990, meeting it myself in a VHS rip probably taken from a Japanese VHS a Western otaku has acquired and made available, shows how deep the well anime is outside from what its usually labelled as.

From http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lq3fz7Ko1H1qc1tyfo1_500.png

Kazuo Umezu is a well regarded horror manga author. He's apparently obsessed with red and white stripes, which would make passing a barber's shop and a candy cane stand bliss for him, and I confess to having yet to read his work, as most or nearly all of his work is not available in the West at all. This anime consists of two stories over forty five minutes. The first, a schoolgirl suspects that the new transfer student is a female vampire, but thanks to videotape the truth is more horrifying. The second is of a group of schoolgirls going into a haunted house to their peril. The most distinct aspect of the anime, bookended by a mysterious thin narrator/crypt keeper who entices us with morality tales, is the visual look of the anime. Clearly there was an attempt to replicate the style of Umezu's manga, black lines heavily used and very grotesque imagery. It shows in the female characters, if just their eye lashes and eyes, who dominate the entire anime. I cannot help but think of Western influences such as gothic art to maybe even dolls with the look of the anime, more so when showing moments of terror for the characters through excessive use of said black lines. It looks good in terms of design, and the format allows for more nastier material. The first story brings in a freakish level of body horror that the cutesy break between two stories cannot make into a complete joke - think of very, very big teeth. The second story, lots of raspberry jam smeared everywhere.

From http://i4.minus.com/jblxSZqXNvhyss.jpg

In terms of quality in other areas, it's not a great work if I'm completely honest. It's grown on me, but this must be stated. The visual look is distinct, but the actual animation is rudimentary. The obsession with moments where the characters freeze in terror do go on a bit, and the stories are very predictable. In terms of entertainment value, it's about the presentation of what's on screen, not originality, that will be whether you like this anime or not. Interestingly, the stories do occupy themselves with the ideas of seeing something only to live to regret it, curiosity killing the cat literally. The first centres around how a video camera can reveal the truth, pre-empting the obsession with technology's tangibility in Japanese horror, only for it to reveal too much. The second, cut into by the narrator, becomes purposely abstract, reality cut to pieces by going to the wrong place. It even gets a bit dreamlike and also reflective of itself, the main two characters watching horror movies, including one called the Curse of Kazuo Umezu, before they end up investigating the haunted house.

From http://zapodaj.net/images/7c2f99d4811ee.jpg

It's a completely minor work. The technical and plotting failings do undermine it. But it's still fascinating, immensely fascinating. Beginners to anime shouldn't view this first - this is for those looking for the deepest, obscurest cuts of anime or horror, forgotten in history and made unique for this and its appearance. Done in the era of hand drawn animation, it still has a textual quality, despite rudimentary animation, that stands out far more than the plastic sheen of post-2000s work made on computers. Almost carnivalesque in its horror - the subversion of body parts and the body, obsessions with toys - it's encouraging to investigate the author's original work, and despite the failings of it, it has stayed on my mind since seeing it. The rarity of horror anime helps it, but it's a strange beast by itself, its forty five minutes memorable. A layer of eeriness trickles throughout it, emphasised by the likelihood the version I saw was an original Japanese videotape release from 1990, having survived to reappear in some form for someone from a different country, me, to find. Myths, legends, eroticism, body horror, historical and cultural information, even Western and Eastern pop culture seeps throughout a great deal of anime and its animation plates alongside the genres within it. They feel far more rooted in deeper and more interesting influences than a lot of Western animation, where even a minor work like The Curse of Kazuo Umezu has something incredibly distinct despite its predictabilities. And since horror anime is rare, its great to see one that brings something interesting with it instead of fail miserably. 

From http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/xnB1Q8adRa4/hqdefault.jpg

T Is For...The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 (1986)

From http://dailygrindhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/The-Texas-Chainsaw-Massacre-2-1986.jpg

Dir. Tobe Hooper

More pulpier and ridiculous than previous entries, this nonetheless shows that any film can be potentially subversive, even one made by Cannon Group. Also there's the likelihood that I'll cover most, if not all, the films in the Texas Chainsaw Massacre series over the following years. At least one will be painful to sit through again, two I've never seen, and yet it won't be as bad as you think, and I will even defend one of them if any.

Review Link - http://www.videotapeswapshop.co.uk/15420/t-is-for-the-texas-chainsaw-massacre-2-1986-director-tobe-hooper/

From http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/10/108875/3034689-0938893114-tcm2b.jpg

S Is For...Separation (1968)

From http://infini-tropolis.com/reviews/images/separationHEADER.jpg

Dir. Jack Bond

Probably one of the more divisive films for me in this series, but Separation managed to still have some great virtues of it. This review will probably show me becoming more admiring of the film if I was to see it again. It'll probably be like The Otherside of the Underneath (1972), the sole, single directorial credit for Seperation's main actress Jane Arden, another difficult experimental film uncovered from British cinema history I will have to ruminate on.

Review Link - http://www.videotapeswapshop.co.uk/15730/s-is-for-separation-%E2%80%93-1968-director-jack-bond/

From http://s3.amazonaws.com/auteurs_production/images/film/separation/w448/separation.jpg?1289466373